Bring Me Your Loves

Tital stolen from St. Vincent

I can’t believe I’m doing yet another post on this subject. This’ll be my last – for a while at least. I’d rather hang myself than have a poly-blog. But jealousy is a complex issue that insists on taking up lots of space. And, as I said in my last post, it’s not just a problem for the polyamorous. It’s everywhere (around us). They say it’s the first fight most monogamous couples have. It causes issues with our romances, work, family, friends, and blah, blah, blah. If only it were as easy to get rid of in real life as it is for The Sims. We have a different kind of programming though. And getting over the jealousy we feel when we see our partner happy with another can be as difficult as getting over the disgust we feel when we see someone eating escargots, Rocky Mountain oysters, or fried spiders. In both cases we think our feelings are natural, the only way that things can be, never realizing how ethnocentric that is. Knowing others grow up enjoying things we’re raised to hate, and vice-versa, doesn’t negate what we feel, it just helps us see that there are other, equally valid, options.

photo-by-yvonne-lee-harijanto

Jealousy means different things to different cultures at different times. When I was a youngster, it was legal to murder a man you found in bed with your wife, and beat your woman half to death. Now that’s only true in states that start with vowels. And Texas. But that says more about our culture’s increasing squeamishness towards violence than possessive jealousy. A 2003 LNE study found that female victims of domestic violence see the abuse as “less negative” as long as jealousy was given as the reason for it. “Well, at least they know he cares.” And that sounds crass but that is kinda how our society raises us to think.

When you’re poly its painfully obvious just how much pop culture centers around monogamy… or more to the point, infidelity. Movies, sitcoms, songs, even cartoons have the problem of choosing between 2 loves, or suspecting someone is getting a bit on the side. For instance, in the last movie I (re)watched, The Incredibles, the heroine suspected her husband of doing some offshore drilling (if ya know what I mean), and instead of asking him about it she used her superpowers to slap a concussion into the other woman. The strange thing was, I watched it with a room full of people, and everyone thought it was perfectly normal. One or two even let out a little cheer; it felt so right. This is the (part of the) world we live in. Where owning one another’s bodies and desires seems natural, and if our significant other does what they want with someone else, they’re stealing something from us.

maxresdefault

There’s no doubt about it, we’re a jealous culture, as was the one before us, and the one before that. Once upon a time Bill Shakespeare called Jealousy The Green-Eyed Monster, and though nowadays most people save that title for Angelina Jolie, not much has changed. We’re raised to think of everything as a zero-sum game. If we see other people blissfully joyful, a part of us gets worried that they’re happier than us. That they’re getting our share of happiness! We’re raised on comparison and competition. It’s implied that there’s only so much joy, success, wealth, and love to go around and we’re owed a slightly larger portion than anyone else. If we let it, it’ll turn us into frightened, greedy, spiteful little Gollum-like creatures always trying to get, and hold on to our precious at all costs. Most of life, in fact, does not work on zero-sum principals. Love, I believe, certainly doesn’t. If it did, when you made another friend, got another pet, or had another child, you’d automatically love the others that much less. Time however, is Zero-sum, and its distribution is something that should probably be discussed in poly relationships.

The Sirionó people do get jealous, but instead of it being because their spouse takes lovers, it happens only if they start spending too much time and energy on those other loves.

photo-by-sho-hatakeyama

In English we really only have one word for love, and we use it for everything, from our favorite song of the moment, to the people we’d die for. Love is a grossly inadequate word. It gives the impression that it’s only one thing. When we talk about the loves we’ve had in our life, we’re kinda forced to make it sound as if they were all the same thing, just different intensities; that there’s a competition between them, and they’re all fighting for the number one spot of True, or Greatest Love. This, I posit, is overly simplistic bullshit, and an offense to emotion. This thinking has you re-ranking all previous relationships every time you find yourself in a new one. Always devaluing a past one for the present, or the newest in comparison to a past. People often ask “how can you love more than one person at a time?” Well, with this mindset I’m not sure you can. Not without some real power-dynamic, love-imbalance issues at least.

I don’t believe you can compare loves. I think of each relationship as an entirely different thing. And of course why wouldn’t it be? The recipe is completely different. The other person is new, and with all you’ve learned from, and since, your last relationship, so are you. Each new love is like a different species of animal. None better or worse than another, just different. Beautiful in it’s own way. No comparison or competition. Just compersion. Hopefully.

your-ancestry-species-evolution-infographic

Comparing ourselves to others, or believing we’re being compared to them is a basic building block to jealousy. It’s something we’re fed from the moment we’re born. Keeping up with the Joneses is something our society is built on. Since we’ve moved away from manufacturing and exporting, the bulk of our economy rest squarely on the soldiers of retail. Our nation makes its money by selling things to itself. For it to survive people have to be convinced to stimulate the economy. Which means buying as much shit as they can afford, and then some. So thank God for advertising! If it wasn’t for ads, we wouldn’t be in debt, in homes we can’t afford, filled with junk we don’t need, and still feeling (it’s) inadequate. Zero-sum comparison and competition is screamed at us with every commercial, and the background hum of all TV shows and movies. It’s no surprise that my-me-mine is a longstanding Western tradition that spills over into all aspects of our lives. It’s so ingrained in us that we recently had to invent a word for being glad that someone we care about is happyCompersion is sorta the anti-jealousy.

poly-family

It may seem hard to swallow, (like Rocky Mountain oysters) the way I’m intertwining something as natural as jealousy with something as man-made as culture, but that’s because there are a lot of societies out there where they’re raised differently. People to whom our beliefs and feelings seem unnatural. True, today monogamy is prevalent in much of the world, another gift of Christian missionaries, but there’s still some untainted love out there if you look.

The Mosuo of China, who don’t have words for rape, war, or murder, believe in almost total sexual freedom. Neither do they have words for wife or husband, using instead one that means “friend.” Some Mosuo unabashedly admit to having had hundreds of lovers. Guilt and disgrace and all that fun stuff is saved instead for if someone ever tries to control another’s sex-life with demands of monogamy. To them jealousy is a form of hostility.

Tahiti’s always been famous for it’s open sexuality. Captains from James Cook  to Samuel Wallis wrote about it so much that Mutiny on the Bounty was written about sailors who refused to leave that sex paradise in spite of captain’s orders. Still today, in-spite-of countless waves of missionaries bible-thumping the gospel of the Jealous God into them and preaching they should only horizontalize with one person (and in the position named after them), several of the South Pacific islands are still known for their sexual freedom.

Of the Pirahã people it has been said, “though [they] do not allow marriage outside their tribe, they have long kept their gene pool refreshed by permitting their women to sleep with outsiders.”

piraha

Anthropologist, Philippe Erikson explained, for the Matis “Extramarital sex is not only widely practiced and usually tolerated, in many respects, it also appears mandatory. Married or not, one has a moral duty to respond to the sexual advances of the opposite-sex cross-cousins, under pain of being labeled ‘stingy with one’s genitals‘… during Matis tattooing festivals, having sex with one’s customary partner(s) is expressly forbidden – under threat of extreme punishment, even death.” Many cultures regularly suspend marital constraints for festivalsThe Warao peoples have mamuse when they are allowed to carnalize whomever they want. At first it was difficult for Anthropologist William Crocker to believe the Canela didn’t feel Jealousy. He wrote, “Whether or not Canela husbands are telling the truth about not minding, they join with other members in encouraging their wives to honor the custom… [of] ritual sex with 20 or more men during all-community ceremonies.” In the end though, he was convinced. There are of course examples a bit closer to home as well, for instance, Brazilians even have a word for the extra-marital sex that’s ok during Carnival: sacanagem.

One of my favorites though are the Kulina. They have a lighthearted little ritual called dutse’e bani towi (in order to get meat) where, early some mornings the women of the village go from home to home. At each house one or more of them steps up and bangs on the house demanding the man go hunt for them – promising him sex if he succeeds. (And no, women don’t ever pick their husbands.) The men lazily pretend disinterest but eventually pull themselves up, grab their tools, and march off to bring home the bacon. Later, before the hunting party heads back to the village they divide up whatever spoils they’ve bagged so no one has to sleep alone.

benjamin-chambers-1100x520

It may seem strange but there are some places that believe to have a healthy child one must be filled with the baby-gravy of many different men. Making the best child from a bit of cock-vomit from the strongest, from the handsomest, and the smartest, the talentedest, and so on. A quick and incomplete list (because I’m already over my word limit) looks something like this; Melanesia’s Marind-anim people, the famous Yanomami, the Piaroa, the Aché, the Mehináku, the Cashinahua, the Ese Ejja, the Kayapo’, the Ye’kwana, the Araweté,  the Kulina,  the Curripaco, the Piaroa, the Siona,  the Bari, the Secoya, and then some.

9781921844249

Be Jealous

(Title stolen from Tech N9ne)

I’ve written dozens of posts before my last, many much more offensive than the preceding two or three. Never before though, have people so felt the need to defend, or argue for, their life decisions. Apparently, me answering some questions and blathering on about why, for many, polyamory may actually be a valid choice, can really get folks’s silky-sin-hiders in a bunch.

Listen, and I say this with all sincerity – from the bottom of my heart – I don’t give a fuck what you do with your love-life. I am not some ‘alternative’ lifestyle salesperson. No-one needs to give reasons why having the option to see more than one person isn’t for them. To each their own. Some of my best friends are monos.

And I don’t mean to sound condescending (though I am, so that’s the way it comes out) but I gotta admit, it can be kinda fun watching people struggle with their cognitive dissonance. Trying to reconcile how in one sentence they say, “poly sounds like too much work.” and in another preach, “Yes, monogamy is hard… But it’s the work that makes it worth it.” Or how they just know their polyamorous relationship wouldn’t last… So they’ll stick with the serial monogamy they’re completely disheartened by. That’s fine. As I said, it’s your fucking-life. There is one excuse that people shovel at me though, one that tickles the inside of my skull a bit.
Oh I could never handle a partnership like that. I’m way too jealous a person.

jealousy_by_meow508-d32799o

If you’ve read just about any of my entries you can probably tell that one of the things most important to me is making the most of ourselves and our short time here. Call it self-actualization, personal optimization, becoming a Jedi, or whatever; it’s about getting over the things inside us that fuck us up, and cause us to fuck up. Some shit we’re born with like default settings to our chattering monkey-minds, others we get hanged-up in on our clumsy stagger to grown-up-hood. I believe everyone should be living lives as fulfilling as they can tolerate, but that means always expanding ourselves and comfort zones. Deconstructing and dismantling the things that keep us from being the best, most well-rounded, people we can be. So, when I hear something like, “Oh I could never even try something new, I’ve got negative emotions I let limit my options,” it’s all I can do to deep-breathe away the eye twitch and the vein that sometimes throbs down my forehead.

No, this doesn’t have anything overtly to do with polyamory, it’s something I like to remind myself and keep fresh, just the underside of my angry vein. (Yes, I mean my penis.) One day we are going to die. And with modern medicine the way it is, chances are it’ll be a long, drawn-out, lingering affair. So we’ll have far too long to reflect on all the things we’ve done – and didn’t do. Between now and then though we should do everything in our power to make the list of Ways we Just Won’t Get the Fuck Outta our Own Way as short as possible. So, I suppose if I am selling something, it’d be taste-testing everything the world has to offer. And only then deciding, well informed and honestly, for yourself, whether to spit or swallow.

deathbed-473x500

This isn’t a compliment, or some bullshit motivational-speak, it’s fact: You are capable of far more than you know. (Yes, even of dealing with your jealousy.) Think of all the things you’ve learned over the years. How you’ve matured, or at least have gotten better at being you. All the things you’ve survived you believed you never could. Parents, fears, schools, heart-break, fights, jobs, shitty relationships, et cetera. You lived to tell the tale, probably stronger and wiser too. You made it by learning, adapting, evolving, and just plain-old toughing it out and doing what you thought was ‘impossible.’ If nothing else those experiences should’ve taught you that you do yourself a disservice whenever you say “I can’t” without even trying.

If it was only fear of your own jealousy holding you back, you’d educate yourself. People have written books you can buy and have delivered to your house in discreet brown paper packages. But if actually laying down money seems like too much of a commitment, it is the 21st century; you can always type jealousy into YouTube followed by polyamory, or non-monogamous, or something along those lines, and hear advice from others who’ve struggled with jealousy and worked through it.

limitationsdemotivator

We all have a Negative Voice in our heads that likes to tell us stories to tear us down and start trouble. But just because we have it, it doesn’t mean it’s ours. One of the favorite tools of the Negative Voice is jealousy. It whispers – and sometimes shouts – that we’re going to lose the things we love the most. That those tricksy little ho-beasts are going to steal our precious! Most of the time the shit that bounces around inside our skulls about others has little to do with the outside world. The Evil Fucker that lives in our head stokes our insecurities and fans the flames of our resentment. It tells us all sorts of painful stories – which, fortunately can often be reassured away by some open and honest conversations about our feelings with our trusted loved ones. This is why in polyamorous relationships they say communication is the key, as opposed to the stereotypical monogamous one where communication tends to be minimal, and topics about feelings for, or attraction to others are forbidden.

Now, I’m not a big communicator. I’m a researcher, a thinker, a writer – and maybe a couple of other things too. But when it comes to having difficult conversations, or talking about my feelings… or even admitting I have feelings, I’m definitely not one of those people. Not naturally anyway. But that’s one thing about polyamory, if done right, there’s probably going to be some growing pains.

hqdefault

There are all types of jealousy; from sibling rivalry to what some call “romantic” jealousy, to the jealousy you feel towards our loved ones’ hand-held devices or to my perfection. It happens; at work, between family members, and friends. (Though sexual jealousy is the only one we treat like an insurmountable problem.) Yes, The Green-Eyed Monster roars its ugly head everywhere. And despite what some might pretend, it’s a perfectly normal and natural emotion. It’s us anticipating the grief we’d feel if we lost something valuable. Yes, hurting ourselves with worry can be a “misuse of imagination” as they say. But I think that overall, pain is underrated.

Pain is a message that something is wrong, that we’ve got to change how we’re doing something, take better care of ourselves, or just be more aware. Medical science tell us that lepers don’t famously lose bits of themselves as a direct symptom of the disease, but because of the numbness it causes. Without the ability to feel hurt they never realize that they’re fucking themselves up, or that their wounds need to be better tended.

Jealousy, in any kind of relationship, is a sign that we feel threatened, or un-secure. A common mistake people make when these feelings come up is they feel embarrassed by them, or frustrated with themselves for feeling them, and so they hide from, or wallow in them. Or they blame others for the feeling instead of taking ownership of them, and taking them as an opportunity to be insightful and examine, why. Why the insecurity?

563415

Bizarre Love Polygon

(Title stolen from New Order and beaten into submission)

Apparently, the bondage of wedlock is a holy, unbreakable institution – that might shatter and crumble like a communion wafer if I keep spitting my little opinions at it. Or at least that’s what some seem to believe, judging by their reactions to my digitally ephemeral (ephemerally digital?) words. They act as if I’m telling them that no one will ever love them. And sure, this may be the case, but that’s hardly my fault.

Look, if you want to try and find that one person who’s going to fulfill you romantically, and intellectually, and spiritually, and sexually, and up all your other -allys all the time, and forever. Great. Go for it. Good luck. I’m sure you’ll find that 1 in 7,500,000,000+ and you’ll have all the same interests and love all each other’s hobbies, and be able to be all that each of you needs and wants. (Sigh) Then you can legally bind yourselves together, promising to only change and grow in the same direction, in the same ways, and at the same pace, so you can both still always be everything for your lover. And you’ll never need or want to connect with anybody else – until one of you dies. Beautiful as a fairy tale.

Photo by Gabby Orcutt

To be honest, there’ve been times when I’ve wished Happily-Ever-After sounded as beautiful to me, as it seemed to to everyone else. But it doesn’t. More than being impossibly ridiculous (ridiculously impossible?), it actually sounds kinda unpleasant. I believe people are too complex and multifaceted for any one other person to fulfill. And that’s a wonderful thing.

You’ll never find someone to share every aspect of your life with. There’s just not anyone who’s into all the same weird, idiosyncratic little things you are. No, instead of nearly finding your Opposite Number, you’re going to meet whole, intricate, and labyrinthine souls. Ones that no matter how much you overlap, will still be full of things so different from you, you won’t be able to imagine. It’ll be amazing, but as they are their own person and all, they’re also going to dislike a lot of the things you enjoy.

Most couples feel the need to try and drag each other along on their boring adventures. And, out of love, people force themselves to grin and bear it, while the whole time the sweetheart they’re tolerating it for, is distracted by their slightly pained expression. This eventually breeds resentment from both parties.

No. No one person will ever be able to be anyone’s everything. People turn themselves inside-out and run themselves ragged trying. But it never completely works, not in the long-run at least. Not even if they’re perfect for you. Because sometimes you’ll feel the need for something they can’t be. Something different. That’s just how humans work. We crave novelty. We want different things at different times. We’re dice flying around inside human tornados. It’s what keeps us learning, and evolving, and striving to improve. It’s also one of the things that makes long-term monogamous relationships so difficult.

For me, the answers to these, and most relationship problems has always been pretty simple. ‘Allow’ my significant others to see others.

quote-love-is-an-ideal-thing-marriage-a-real-thing-a-confusion-of-the-real-with-the-ideal-johann-wolfgang-von-goethe-34-49-51

When people hear about polyamorous relationships some imagine; swingers, key-parties, married couples with their living sex-toys, great Roman bacchanals, golden tickets to fuck every person you come across, or any number of strange combinations. When really, no matter what they picture, they’re wrong. The truth is that there’s no such thing as typical polyamory. Even if you’ve known someone in one, or have been in one yourself, you still can’t make accurate assumptions about others. Not even your next.

Monogamy is like a one-size-fits-all suit. In “traditional” relationships, we can assume that our next one will have pretty much the same rules as our last. Rules so obvious they don’t even have to be discussed. Our lover makes the same assumptions and all goes along fine and dandy until the other person crazily breaks some rule that you’ve never really discussed. But they should’ve known! I mean really, what were they, raised by bats?! Actually, perhaps I should’ve said monogamy is one-size-fits-most?

Polyamorous relationships on the other hand, have to be tailored made to fit the individuals involved. This obviously can be a bit complicated because with this game of love you get to come up with your own rules. And the rules can be changed over time because polyamory acknowledges that people want different things at different spots in their lives. In fact, that’s kinda the crux of the whole thing. Relationships are fluid, because people are; because life is.

It’s a great big world out there, full of possibilities with all different kinds of people with all different types of relationships. Why only accept the cookie cutter ones your parents handed down to you?

1182208

Now, I know what some of you are thinking; this person just has a fear of commitment. Or at least that’s the contusion a most people jump to. And I’ve been ‘Poly’ since before there was a name for it, so I’ve had had lots of time to meditate on this. And I can confidently say that no, I don’t have a problem with commitment. I’ve had my fair share of devoted relationships that have lasted years and years and have ended better than most “normal” relationships I’ve seen. No, it’s not commitment, it’s monogamy that I’m afraid of. And why wouldn’t I be? Something like that can kill, or at least greatly shorten the lifespan of a pretty perfect relationship. It’s no small feat to decide you’re only going to be with one person until you die, and a choice you might want to take seriously. Betting an entire life-long happy relationship on you both maintaining perfect sexual exclusivity seems insane to me. Especially when you know the deck is stacked against you.

I am honestly flabbergasted that it’s normal for one person to love another, think they’re the best in the whole world, want to share their entire life with them, and blah, blah, blah – until that person cheats. Then hate them, think they’re the worst, and never want to speak to them again. People are “supposed” to rip families apart and take at least half of everything a person’s ever made for this shit. And I’m the abnormal one? Polyamory just admits what most are afraid to say out loud, that everyone is going to want another person at some point. That’s the starting foundation, then the people involved build from there, together. Keeping in mind, that though they’re often conflated, there is no real overlap between monogamy and commitment.

Commitment: noun
. 1. Something that takes up time or energy, especially an obligation. 
2. Devotion or dedication, for example, to a cause, person or relationship. 
3. A planned arrangement or activity that cannot be avoided. 
4. An act of legally confining somebody to prison or a mental health facility.

Monogamy: noun
 1. The practice of having a sexual relationship with only one partner during a period of time.
 2. The practice of being married to only one person at a time. 
3. The practice of having only one mate at a time or during a lifetime

131022171408-poly-diagram-1-story-top

 “Is it so very obvious that you can’t love more than one person? We seem to manage it with parental love (parents are reproached if they don’t at least pretend to love all their children equally), love of books, of food, of wine (love of Chateau Margaux does not preclude love for a fine Hock, and we don’t feel unfaithful to the red when we dally with the white), love of composers, poets, holiday, beaches, friends… Why is erotic love the one exception that everybody instantly acknowledges without even thinking about it?”
~ Richard Dawkins

Marriage Is Gay

(Tital stolen form Doug Stanhope)

As one might imagine, my last post called many generous souls from the (ivory) woodwork to grant me a peek at their enlightenment. Marriages, they tell, give you tax-breaks, give spouses power-of-attorney if one becomes incapacitated, makes wills and inheritances much easier, helps kids do better in school, clears up your complexion, makes you regular, and will lead to world peace and interspecies communication if only I’d give it a try. Trust me folks, I know this stuff. My attorney convinced me of most of it long ago; that’s how I got talked into getting ordained and performing ceremonies. The thing is though, the post in question was about the egomaniacal impracticality of weddings. I don’t know that I spoke of marriages once. So please stop ejaculating your pro-marriage opinions at me – at least until I’m done.

preacher_vertigo_large

Once upon a time, in a far off kingdom (the name/location of which I can’t disclose for legal reasons) I had a dizzying conversation with a lovely Latin American sex-worker. Her second language skills far outshone mine (as did hers of exchange rates and arithmeticking sweaty fistfuls of different types of currency), and I was trying to explain my love life, so you can’t be surprised that she wound up walking away frustrated, calling me “estupido” – whatever that means. Before that though, she taught me that the Spanish word esposas could mean either wives or handcuffs. A useful little tidbit indeed.

Actually, Handcuffs isn’t too far off from what we call those we’re wed-locked with in English; ball and chain, awful-wedded, struggle and strife, boss, battle-axe,  Yoko Ono, the list goes on and on. And then there are the jokes whose punchlines are that marriage is a sexless, controlling institution! Ah, ha, ha, ha ha ha! Those who’ve been together a decade or more laugh their bitter laugh, and curse time or their spouses. Those still in their honeymoon phase laugh because they know that’ll never happen to them. And the ones who’re in the between chuckle nervously at what they fear they’ve started to feel coming down the tracks.

Train_Tracks

The world is full of failed and broken relationships; we know this. By most people’s definition, since every love affair you’ve had up until now has ended, they’ve all been colossal wastes of time. Now, does this mean that you’re a failure at love? Why yes. Yes it does. But that’s only because you’re doing it wrong.* Don’t feel too badly about it though; you never really had a chance. I mean look around, the globe is covered with them; people who’re afraid to commit, the bitter ones who’ve been cheated-on too many times and don’t trust anymore, and those who became distracted and distant too soon. And then there are the ones with whom desire fades too quickly, and you find yourself mimicking your parent’s passionless partnership, restless for any hobby more interesting than spending time with their ‘lover.’ Why can’t it be like it is in the movies? The obvious answer is because films, TV, books, and all the places we see dream relationships, are only fantasies. Modern fairy tales. Real life just doesn’t work that way. That’s why one can’t even go to the market and exchange their sweaty fistfuls of coins for a short list of necessities (gatorade, duck-tape, sugar-free chocolate syrup, rubber gloves, anti-fungal condoms, deodorizing pubic shampoo, and that family-size tub of lubricant/hemorrhoid cream) without being bombarded with dozens of bits of advice on “how to spice up an old relationship,” or “inflame your tired spouses genitals,” or some similar horse-twaddle “in the bedroom“. It’s not just you, it’s everybody.

funny-women-magazine-cover

On the one hand finding out that everybody is pretty much in the same boat can be a frightening prospect. Does this mean you’re doomed to either a long, comfortable, lustless, domestication, or as Doctors Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jetha put it, have serial monogamy stretch before (and behind) you like an arpeggio of failure: isolated islands of transitory happiness in a cold sea of disappointment? Maybe. But look on the bright side, at least you can throttle back a little on some of the guilt. As it turns out humans don’t really have a magic switch in their brain that when clicked to the Love setting makes everyone except their significant other forever unattractive. So yes, it’s normal and natural for both you, and your partner, to be attracted to others. In fact, if you think about it, if you’re really planning on spending the rest of your life with someone, it’s kinda insane to think that neither of you are ever going to wanna join giblets with anyone else – ever.

People don’t want to see it this way though. They’d rather believe in Happily-Ever-Afters and assume when passion fades they weren’t the right one, or they were damaged because they still looked at others, or that your love was broken because you find yourself wanting another, or that you weren’t really loved at all, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. But don’t worry; I’m sure the next one will be perfect.

Fairy-Couple-1366x768-wide-wallpapers.net

It sends traditionalists into denial fueled rages but more and more Science is coming clean that longterm monogamy just isn’t in our DNA. And really, why would it be when only 3% of mammals are, and our closest relatives are the famously promiscuous chimps and bonobos. Actually, we’re more closely related to them, then they are to any other monkey, gorilla, or ape. In fact, we’re nearer to them than the African elephant is to the Indian elephant. Nowadays the people who specialize in such things tell us our bodies are actually hardwired to make us (want to) stray after a few years with the same person. Apparently genetic diversity is kinda important for our species’ continued existence. This is why humans get what we used to call the seven year itch. Today though, researchers think genetically it’s more like the 3-5 year itch. This is why I always suggest that if you really feel the need to get married, at least wait until after that amount of time to see if you still really want to be with each other after all those wonderful love-drugs produced by the brain level off. Then go plan your big narcissistic waste-of-money-you-could’ve-been-used-to-better-the-world social-function. Opa!

Now, I’m not saying it’s impossible to match ends with only one person for the rest of your life, just unnatural. Obviously. If people truly thought they’d never want to leave each other they wouldn’t need to make a legally binding contract that explicitly states, “in the good times and the fucked.” They’d just stay together because their relationship is full of love and fun. But we know that’s not the way it works, so we try to vow to hold on to that passion forever. Love is the only emotion we feel the need to promise to always feel for someone. And just in case, we make adultery illegal too. The penalties for getting a little hanky-panky on the side have ranged from being banished, to being tortured to death, to having your soul burn in Hell for eternity. In some parts of the world, this can still happen, and you know what? People still play musical beds. You’d think with the stakes this high we’d be able to stop ourselves. But you’d be wrong. Now, if monogamy was natural, why would we need such deterrents, and why haven’t they ever worked?

77160197ef5097b20108256a2a042f82

In the interest of full disclosure though, I have to admit that I’m probably not the one who should be preaching against unnatural acts. I’m a big fan of several. For instance, genetically I am an omnivorous ape; I, however, haven’t eaten meat yet this century. Yes, the world is filled with an overwhelming amount of dead animal, prepared in all sorts of interesting ways, and I choose to make my life more difficult by not indulging in any of it. The difference is though, instead of the veggies, here it’s the ones in the mainstream majority, the unnatural marrying kind, who are the annoying, self-righteous, preachy ones.

American Wedding

Tital stolen from the Gogol Bordello song

I’m not the type of person who gets invited to a lot of weddings, for a number of reasons – not all of which are my fault. Firstly, whether it’s because they’re iconoclastic, or cynical my friends aren’t usually the type for such quaint traditions. But I do get to hang out with a pretty diverse group so sometimes they do occasionally, for whatever reason, feel the need to tie the(mselves in) knot(s). Even then though, I’m still (almost) never invited. I suspect this might have something to do with my usually having fucked at least one of the people at the altar. It’s most often the bride but really no one’s safe, not even the person performing the ceremony. (Some say promiscuity will get you Absolutely Nowhere but at least it gets you uninvited to a lot of weddings). Also, I can be pretty unpredictable, especially when there’s an open bar. (What a beautiful phrase. Open is a wonderful word. Bar is a great one too. Put them together and I just want to be showered in their synergism.) One can never tell if I’m going to give an eloquent, heart-felt speech, or be standing half naked on the open bar shouting some brilliant diatribe that’s really mostly only slurred expletives. And finally there’s this pesky little thing I have about being against marriage, and preaching against it as often as I can. So when the magic moment comes and the person performing the ceremony asks, “Does anyone know why these two shouldn’t be legally joined in matrimony?” everyone holds their breath and all eyes turn to (oblivious) me, throwing my clothes down from the open bar, covered in 151, lighter in hand.
“What?”

10350420_788645371168490_8478944484192546948_n

When I say I don’t get invited to a lot of weddings, there’s two things you should know. One: I totally get it, you don’t want me to ruin your nuptials, and I don’t want me to either. And two: It’s not a complaint. Not just because they’re usually soul-crushingly boring either. It’s more that the whole thing makes me feel like an alien. I wander around reading all the happy faces and none of them seem to think there’s anything at all strange about the whole getting wed-locked thing.

In this day-and-age where, I’d guess almost 100% of couples live in sin for months or years before making honest souls of each other, and then after the reception head right beck to the place they’d been shacking up, one has to look at their special day and wonder, “What the fuck was the point?”

It’s basically renting someone to help them (Wedding planner $3,262) pick a beautiful setting ($12,300-$14,000) to fill with flowers they paid to have someone grow and murder for them that will be taking up space in a landfill next garbage day ($1,600), to play dress-up ($1,350 for a dress you’ll only wear once plus hair & make-up for $250), and have their portraits taken in ($2,800). Then they get to make messes of themselves and each other by gorging on overpriced food ($12,800) and cake ($440), followed by dancing to songs a stranger thinks they might like, or at least want played ($990).

Ah, but really, what price can one put on an entire day of being the center of attention, getting gifts, hearing everyone compliment and tell cute little anecdotes, and lie about how your union will always be as full of love as it is that day – because your love is so special, because you’re so special? But while they’re saying this they’re trying to hide that they’re all secretly wishing you two lovebirds would disappear and go fuck already so the rest of them can relax. Yes, everyone there is (un)consciously thinking about you two passionately playing each other’s organs. Especially your family. What price can one put on all this? Well the wedding industry would say about $26,600.
I’m all for folks finding good excuses to party and have their foul ways with each other but I bet you can think of some less opulent and narcissistic ways to go about it.

nude_wedding

Not counting ones I’ve performed (yes, it’s true. I’m not proud of it) this week I went to only my fifth wedding, and for someone who’s almost forty, I feel that’s quite a feat. I do have to admit though, all the ones I’ve been invited to have been pretty great, and non-boring. It’d obviously have to be a non-traditional ceremony to have me on the guest list.

Traditional is a word we often hear paired with marriage. But traditionally marriage wasn’t about love; it was a calculated business, political, or tactical venture, a way of legally binding two tribes, so basically trading your children for peace or wealth. The idea of choosing the person you’d spend your life with was unheard of. Which, in a way, might actually make more sense. I mean really, who would’ve been so blissfully in love… they needed lawyers and government just to make it even better? But somehow it all came to be, and now it’s tradition and if you don’t give it a whirl, society says you’re strange at best, and pitiful at worst. So you better move quick, or the good ones will be gone!
photo by Ezra Jeffrey

So you’ve decided it’s time to settle down. The first thing you’ll need is a ring. I hope you’ve been living below your means or have a high enough credit limit because that left-hand decoration is supposed to cost 3 months salary. I haven’t allowed myself enough space here to go into all the reasons those little finger-rocks are compressed evil and suffering so I’ll just stick with why they’re traditionally iniquitous. In Ancient Greco-Romeia they believed the ring-finger was connected to the heart. The ring was like a little collar that the giver would put over the heart strings to keep it from wandering away like a stray. Gotcha! It also, of course, doubled as proof to the world that this heart already had an owner – besides the person who was actually born with it.

But whatever, now it’s official! You’re getting hitched to another person! Next you get to look over all the happy and hopeful faces of your friends and family and tell them all which one you love more than all the others! This part can be stressful enough to make you long for the time before bridesmaids were bullied into buying hideous dresses they’d only wear once just to make the bride look better by comparison. Back before maids of honor, the gaggle of them all tried to look and dress identical to the bride to confuse evil spirits who wanted to fuck up the lucky lady’s happy day. So perhaps you didn’t want to pick your bestest friends to do it, but who else was going to risk being possessed by Smegnarrok the Infernal Lord of the Hell’s Taint for you?

My unsettling hypothesis is that all ‘demon possessions’ that took place around weddings were just people’s way of explaining away the brides ‘cold feet.’ And by cold feet I mean sheer terror at spending the rest of her life, legally and religiously, bound to the man who was about to rape her. You see, in Medieval Germany courting was a lot like what we’d call today, “kidnapping.” During the ceremony it was literally the job of “the best man” to stand by the groom and keep and eye on the crowd and make sure none of the young lady’s family “objected,” and fend off anyone who tried to rescue her. So again you might not have wanted your closest friend as much as your most intimidating henchgoon.

Taking all this into consideration, I don’t want to delve too deeply into why it was the groom had to carry his bride into her new home, but my guess is that many of them were kicking and screaming. Some blamed women and their weak souls for being possessed by Smegnatron the Hellish Supervisor of that Nether Place again, and others say they just didn’t want blushing brides to seem too eager about losing their virginity. That happy one’s my favorite.

carry_me_bridal_style__by_matthew_who_williams-d5xkcjl

Virginity until marriage (for women) used to be a pretty big deal. In the Old Testament, The Good Lord commands that if a bride is accused by her groom of not being a virgin, she had to come up with some proof she was, like bloodstained wedding-night linens or something, or “she shall be brought to the door of her father’s house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by being promiscuous“. Perhaps this is why in some centuries lucky(?) members of the wedding party got to follow the newlyweds into the honeymoon suite and actually witness the consummation. And when it was all over but the screaming, it was their job to take the young lady’s besmirched garter out into the reception and hold it up as proof.
Mazel Tov!

SCpanties

Creatrix

In the beginning there was only Void, what Taoists call The Supreme Ultimate.  A place of nothing but the pure potential of everything that can, or could ever be. Science tells us that before the Big Bang, there wasn’t any such thing as Time or Space, only potential, perhaps similar to the infinite potential that quantum physics tells us lives inside the nucleus of every atom.

Then with the Big Bang God(dess) separated Heaven and Earth from Him/Herself. For before, they were formless and void; just the spirit of God(dess) moving on the infinite. The Void was God(dess). And He/She said, ‘Let there be Yin and Yang’ and split Her/Himself into two. And God(dess) saw that it was good and continued to divide into more dynamic properties; Heaven/Earth, light/darkness, hot/cold, day/night, waking/sleeping, summer/winter, living/dying, and thing/no-thingness.

Thus the heavens and the Earth were created. But God(dess) was not yet satisfied, so He/She said, ‘Let Us make people in our image.’ And like holographic shards, each piece was a microcosm of the whole, She/He formed humanity’s genetic-code: a complex spiral chain of binary-code – on/yang/expressed and off/yin/regulated. And God(dess) filled the nucleus of all humanity’s atoms with the same Void the Earth, and She Himself were made up of. Filled with almost nothing but the pure potential of Quantum Mechanics. And out of that ground, and various mixtures of the two principle elements, God(dess) formed every beast of the field, bird of the sky, and creature of the sea. All made from, and entangled with, the stardust created from the Big Bang. But for the human, who She/He called Atom, there was not found a companion suitable. So God(dess) anesthetized him and from his side took a rib and fashioned another creature, alchemically continuing the refining process. As man was converted from the baser earth, so this creation was more refined (for she could reproduce) from that which she was made, Atom. And together man and wo-man were like God(dess) and naked and unashamed.

b

When our plane-of-existence was big-banged into existence 13.7 billion years ago, ‘reality’ began to expand into the Void, an expansion that science tells us is still continuing at this moment – like a wave of EveryThing spreading out and creating space-time and infinity as it does. Expanding into what? Why, pure potential of course.

Taoists believe that everything moves in cycles. And the way I was taught it was that the Supreme Ultimate Void first split into Yin/Yang and from those two ‘elements’ comes the myriad of things that we call Any/EveryThing. And it all will continue to divide into more, and more, and more things, breaking down like fractals into more, and more things, until the complexities of life on the edge of chaos get as vast and splintered as it possibly can. Then it’ll all begin to recede back to center, and coalesce, until everything is just two, and then all will be One again. Back into Void. The size and potential of the nucleus of an atom. And then rebirth all over. Just another Singularity

Of course no one really knows how it’s gonna end, but some scientists believe that the universe is still in it’s expanding (Yang) phase and that eventually there will be a (Yin) phase of contraction all the way back into a Big-Crunch. And then BANG! Genesis all over again. An endless cycle rolling around much the way the Earth-ball keeps spinning away its days and nights and going around the sun, year after year after year. No beginning and no end. Just cycles of transition, like a spectrum on a Mobius strip.

c

Nowadays it seems that everything that we own and do is being converted into bits and bytes of binary code – on (yang), off (yin). We used to play instruments, then we listened to it analog, now it’s only 1s/on and 0s/off. We used to paint with lots of materials, then we snap-shot with film, now 1s and 0s. So who knows, maybe our wave has broke and is beginning to roll back. Maybe we’re headed home back to the Void. To nothingness. But that thought doesn’t have to be disheartening. One should never underestimate no-thing; it’s full of the most potential. If we could harness the energy from the ‘empty space’ of just one hydrogen atom, it would yield a trillion times as much energy as all the mass from all the stars and all the planets out to twenty billion light-years away. And besides, the idea of an eternal renewal is a lot cheerier than how many scientists think the universe will meet its end.

e

 

Sex: The Meaning of Life

Of all the things you’ll ever do in your life, sex is the most important. Yes, without a little assault with a friendly weapon every now and again, your life would be completely meaningless, or at least that’s what science tells us. It used to be Survival of the Fittest meant the strongest, cleverest, and/or bestest, beasties always came out on top. There was a nice, sweaty, only the strong’ll survive, Law of the jungle kind of romance about that. Nowadays though, we seem stuck with a gene-centric view of evolution which turns the creature that stalks the (concrete) jungles, trying to be the best, into merely a container that holds and/or ejaculates its selfish genes  into the next generation. Those who squeeze out the most offspring are the fittest and most successful, and to do that, we’ve got to bump our uglies together over and over again until they’re a hot and sore, ruddy and slimy mess. Hooray for science!

dc008

So you can’t, or won’t, have children of your own? Well, that’s ok too, I guess. Just because cold, hard-science shoves you to the ground, calls you “useless,” and shouts, “adoption is for losers,” it doesn’t mean you still can’t contribute to the the human experience. You can still create beautiful works of art or architecture, conquer strange lands or strange sports, play beautiful music or games, compose grandiose symphonies or lies, invent new hypothesizes or devicesizes, write books, sonnets, or software, or win the next election to be America’s top astronauts, however that works. The possibilities are endless. The thing is though, if you ask flaccid, soft-sciences you’ll get a similar answer; it all comes down to you trying to get laid. Especially if you’re that most pathetic, and testosterone marionetted humanoid-desperate, male.

The theory is, in a world where everyone is trying to pick the best possible mates, we’re driven to be great at something (that’ll initiate some gland-to-gland combat). This, we are told, is why we build ginormous things, attain high social status, make gobs of money, risk our lives, and try to be good people. It all comes down to trying to impress others so they’ll let us get them all sticky with our love-gunk.

Photo by Stefan Kunze

Now, believe it or not, I’m no expert, nor am I willing to do enough research to become one, so I guess I can’t really argue. Maybe we are all only defined by our obsession with our/other people’s junk. I’ve got to admit though, I don’t feel like a junkie, but I guess most don’t. Who knows; maybe the world is just a flash of skin, a suggestive look, and a drunken suggestion away from exploding into Carnival?

I’d thought that my occasionally volunteering with ‘troubled teens’ and ‘at risk youth’ was because I’d been one, way-back-when, (and still feel that way sometimes,) but apparently it’s because I want to look good enough to attract a mate. Anyway, we have a dress-code for exactly that reason, so the kids, drunk on hormones, don’t spontaneously devolve into a Fat Tuesdayesque orgy. To be totally honest though, instead of “we have,” I really should’ve said, “females have a dress code.” You know; no short-shorts, no midriffs showing, no bare shoulders, that sort of thing, all the usual stuff that makes perfect sense – if we don’t question it too much.

For instance, why do we put the responsibility for ‘the boys lack of self-command’ on the girls? Don’t people have the right to wear what they want without the onus being put on them for the actions of half the species? Isn’t blaming woman for ‘man’s inability to restrain himself’ just thinly veiled misogyny masquerading as ‘decency,’ and hinting at a Junior High School version of, “She was asking for it, look what she’s wearing”?

We seem to think that seeing a bit of ass has the same effect on young men that full moons do werewolves. They drool and howl, get hairy palms, rip out of their clothes, and tear into any and every potential victim they come across. Instead of trying to normalize sex, and teaching them self-possession we hide them from as much temptation as we can and make skin taboo, because creating a mystique around sexuality will make it less desirable, and infringing upon the rights of young women to express themselves through their clothes will make them want to dress more conservatively. Obviously.

werewolf_woman-421x500

Things have changed a lot since I was a kid, and thank fucking goodness. Back then it was common knowledge that sex was something boys were supposed to want and girls were supposed to withhold. The first shots in the war between the sexes were fired the first time someone wanted to play doctor. If, however, a young man could be the right mix of charming, handsome, clever, lucky, or whatever the magic ingredients of wooing were, and the young woman was sweet and generous, then she might lie back, close her eyes, and think of England, either out of a sense of duty or the goodness of her charitable heart. I was a virgin until college.

It seems almost impossible to believe but there was a time, not all that long ago, where it was seen as the woman’s role to say no to sex, and the man’s to convince her. Any girl who actually wanted or enjoyed making whoopee was obviously a freak of nature to be looked down on. I can still remember the first time I was watching TV and heard that women actually take pleasure in having their tummies tickled from the inside. It shattered my entire sexual paradigm. And again, thank fucking goodness.

Getting someone fucked up to lower their inhibitions, pressuring or coercing them, sexual harassment, marital rape – there’s not enough space or time to list all the things that have been normal as far back as recorded history, things that are finally now starting to go out of style. We don’t need to keep hammering home “No Means No” because it’s difficult message to get; we have to because the rest of the (rape) culture is sending a different one. In our favorite movies, damn catchy radio songs, and the punchlines of our comedy, they’re so ubiquitous they’re almost invisible. Things have changed a lot in the 30-something years I’ve been alive, and I think the frankness more and more people are having about sex is playing a crucial part.

Year 6 sex education at a school in Lambeth

In keeping with tradition, most people would prefer to do just about anything rather than have a candid discussion about intercourse, especially with children. I am lucky enough though to have a handful of friends who are raising their kids with healthy views of sex. The other day one was talking about putting her young teen on the pill and the man she was talking to said the old standard, “My daughter isn’t dating until she’s 30.” to which my friend stated that her daughter was in control of her own body. Yes, even her sexuality. The mother firmly believed that her daughter’s skin-encapsulated-spirit was no one’s but her daughter’s. She suggested that he was teaching his little girl that others could have more rights over her body than she did, and possibly setting her up for a lifetime of men telling her what she should(n’t) do with it.

I myself am a proud parent of none, but (in theory) I have to side with the crazy notion of treating littler ones as if they have their own minds and souls, guiding them but allowing them to make their own decisions. It’s always amazing to see my friends do this with their own human-larva, and raise them sex-positive. I can’t imagine what the world would look like if everyone did that. A sexual Mardi Gras? Maybe. But a safe and healthy one.

 

 

Fuck Celibacy

If you look at it dispassionately, clinically, you’ve got to admit that parts of Catholicism look a-whole-lot like some sort of Psychological/Sociological experiment to find out how much it’ll take to make a heterosexual Man of God want to fuck little boys.
Now, this may sound a tad harsh, but remember, we’re just examining the cold, hard, facts.

First, we take a young (holy)man fresh out of seminary who’s got strict orders never to have sex – or even masturbate. Ever! Then we make it his solemn duty to sit alone in a dark closet and listen to everyone softly confess their filthiest deeds and fantasies to him… Did I mention the no chokin’-the-gopher thing yet? Next, with no relief in sight, we give this poor devout soul a private rectory, and a slave-boy, who we put in a white dress, and make light candles and bring wine. Then we continue this test every day for the rest of the Priest’s life.

I’m not making excuses or anything, I’m just saying that the only folks who should be shocked when fucked-up shit happens, are those who’ve got no clue of the appetite or mating habits of the one-eyed-trouser-snake. Right now this experiment is being conducted on 414,313 men in robes around the globe. Try not to think about that the next time you’re kneeling in church.

I’m not the only one who thinks this is absurd. Saint Thomas Aquinas, a holy-man of God, who spent much of his life grading and categorizing as many sins as his twisted little mind could conjure, thought long and hard about the issues of Man’s sex drive and believed that sex-workers might be a necessary fail-safe to relieve the build up of (sexual) tension.

“If you do away with harlots, the world will be convulsed with lust” ~ Saint Thomas Aquinas.

I’m not saying it’s some big conspiracy or anything, but if it were it’d be a fucking brilliant one. By making priests take a vow of celibacy, they become unable have any legitimate heirs, so any money they’ve inherited, were paid, or made by any other means, automatically gets left to the Church when the good father shuffles off this mortal coil. And all the Church had to do was keep him from giving any hot meat injections. Brilliant. And it worked so well they expanded upon the idea and made sex off limits for everyone, essentially taking something our very genes compel us to do and calling it sick. They pathologize our drives and convince us that only they have the remedy. And when we find out they can’t cure us of our nature, they blame it on our sinful ways. They can treat our sickness, but only if we keep coming back again and again and volunteer as much of our time, money, and soul as we can stand.

8097956-Church-members-putting-money-in-the-collection-plate--Stock-Photo

“The Great Reformer,” Martin Luther agreed with St. Tom that a little flesh session every now and again might be necessary to keep one healthy and sane. He thought celibacy “horrific” and predicted that even for priests, it’d bring “division, sin, shame, and scandal to be increased without end.” For Luther, sex was a good thing, as long as one wasn’t committing adultery.

“And just what counts as adultery in the Good Book?” You’ve probably never thought to ask. “A book whose protagonists visit prostitutes and have sex-slaves, and multiple wives?” I’ll pretend you continued.

Well, if you’ve been paying attention, you can probably guess that any answer you want from the bible will have to be pulled out of a waist-deep quagmire of confusion and misogyny.

These days we have a very womanish view of what counts as an extra-martial affair. That is to say in the Bible, adultery for a woman, means having sex with anybody who she’s not wedded to. For a man though, it means doing the dicky dunk with someone else’s slaves, wives, or other property, But; gang-rape, sex workers, raping war-captives, incest, public rape, owning sex-slaves, and the incest/rape combo meal are just fine, and again, just for men. But remember ladies, the moral of the story is, “No fucking anyone but your husband – or we’ll fucking kill you.”

I gotta tell ya, the more I read these old scriptures, the less surprised I am that people used to enjoy feeding the zealots who lived by them to the lions.

l_ps1_37113_fnt_dd_t09

A few years back I found myself hiking up an active volcano in Southern Italy. It’s been an unassuming little mountain for most of its life. Back before year 79, it was so boring it didn’t even have a name; the natives just called it “Mountain.” After that though, there weren’t any natives left to call it anything.
When Mount Vesuvius rained hellfire and ash down on Pompeii and Herculaneum, it entombed them, preserving everything in place for the next sixteen centuries. Theses two cities waited patiently while above weather, war, and Christianity wore away at, rewrote, or erased whole chapters of history. Books were burned, morals twisted, art destroyed, and modesties cultivated. While those two Ancient Roman time-capsules awaited cracking entire ways of thought and ways of life were being scrubbed clean or scrubbed from existence.
When Pompeii and Herculaneum were finally cracked open it was to the titters and radiant blushing of the 1700’s. The millennia-and-a-half of Catholic censorship (painting clothes or fig leaves over, or just straight-up chiseling off the art world’s intimate bits) had left the world unprepared for what life had been like in our pagan past.

Nowadays, if you wander through this two rediscovered cities you’ll get to hear lots of full-grown tourists snickering like children at all the very public nudity and sexual art. Mildly amused tour-guide explain that Romans saw sex as natural and normal, something that everyone has in common. And so, if it’s something everyone does, what’s the point in hiding it?

18lql57ko812sjpg

Somewhere along the way we got it in our heads that sex was bad; having it was bad, looking at it was bad, talking about it was bad, and thinking about it was bad. That’s our story and we’re sticking to it. No matter what the evidence says.

In reaction to the Summer of Love the US Government sat down and tried to figure out just what to do about all the nudity and sexiness that was going on all around. It was sure to unravel the moral fiber of this great country of ours and something needed to be done. The Commission on Pornography and Obscenity was conceived to look into the matter and make its recommendation. Eventually, after exhaustive research, the commission made its report. It found that on average, sex offenders were more often raised in conservative households and used porn less than the average person. Based on their findings the commission suggestions were for sex education and against restricting pornography for adults. The proposals was emphatically rejected.

(Isn’t odd that the {neo}conservatives who’re always shouting about how government should keep its big nose out of the affairs of businesses, are also the ones who think the government should ban things like porn and sex-toys?)

Contrary to what those who so vehemently opposed the Commission’s verdict believe, a culture of strict conservatism doesn’t keep us safe from the all the unpleasantries of life; it may in fact do just the opposite. Some studies show that wherever religious fundamentalism is the most intense so are things like abortions, divorces, murders, rapes, STDs, teen pregnancy, etc. Of course correction is not causation, but it does suggest that no, being godly does not make you squeaky clean, you don’t need religion to be a decent person, and even the threat of Hellfire is not a deterrent.

slide_325098_3110944_free

The world is full of people who spend their lives being confused by, feeling guilty over, and/or hating themselves for not being able to live up to standards that the Church and society set. People who are sure that something must be wrong with them and spent their entire lives fighting with natural and healthy drives. How do we know these things are normal? Well, fornication and adultery still happen, even in places in the world where your body is threatened with murder and your soul with torture for all eternity. One doesn’t need those sort of threats to stop us from doing things that don’t come naturally to us.

 

Transubstantiation

Throughout our lives everything about us changes; our looks, our values, our memories, all of it, right down to an atomic level. Maybe that’s one of the reasons so many are obsessed with butterflies. All over the world these bugs are symbols of transformation. Between their births and their deaths they reshape themselves into things so different it’s impossible to even recognize them as the same species. And something in us just loves that.

03

I like to call this painting Re-Conception because Born-Again were already taken. And besides, being re-conceived sounds like more fun than being re-born, anyway. I suspect these smears of acrylic, like all butterfly tales, are a sort of coming of age story – a sort of puberty for the soul – minus the story, of course.

05

The process of a caterpillar becoming a butterfly isn’t anything like most of us imagine. She doesn’t just blanket herself in a cocoon for privacy whilst she squeezes out her new wings. No it’s much more apocalyptic than that.

07After she’s lived out her childhood and has grown all that she can in her old body she suddenly feels the need for a change. Instinctively she starts to ‘wander,’ looking for a place where she feels safe. Once she’s found a place conducive to her changing needs she begins to create her chrysalis, like a second womb, around her.

09

After she’s shielded herself from the world she begins to totally break down and deconstruct herself. If one were to crack open her shell in the middle of this process, inside they wouldn’t find who she has been, or who she will become. No caterpillar, or butterfly, or anything recognizably in between. She completely liquifies herself, leaving only some white goo. But it’s from that protoplasm that she’ll rebuild herself into something perfectly new.

13

The neatest part though, I think, is that scientists have recently discovered that the knowledge that she’s collected up to the moment she crawls into her cocoon as a caterpillar, she somehow holds on to through the caterpillar-stew of her metamorphoses, and gets to take with her when she flies away into adulthood as a butterfly.